They changed the ending! And it was Amazing!

My daughter and I went to see My Fair Lady on International Women’s Day. Yes, given the themes of the show, it was an odd choice for the day. But we were celebrating her birthday, and her childhood copy of the VHS tape had been worn out by frequent use. We watched lots of musicals in her childhood. She’s 31 now. Who doesn’t love opulent costumes, a two storey set with a winding staircase, and wonderful music, even if the male roles in the show are some of the most misogynistic ever.

So we almost blinked and missed it at the end. In fact, we were walking out when it dawn on us. “Hey, I know we haven’t seen the movie in something like 25 years, but was the movie ending the same as the one we just saw?” I drove the 45 minutes home while she did the research.

The movie we so loved in her childhood was a 1964 production of a 1956 Broadway Musical. The musical was based on a 1912(3) George Bernard Shaw play entitled Pygmalion (based on Greek mythology). If you don’t know the basics, professor Henry Higgins takes on Eliza Doolittle on a bet that he can turn her from a lowly flower seller with a Cockney London accent – into a “proper” lady. When Eliza “passes.” Henry takes all the credit. She leaves. He sings “I’ve Grown Accustomed to her Face.” She comes back. Though there is some indication that the professor has evolved somewhat, as soon as she comes back, he says, “Where the devil are my slippers?” The curtain closes. The implication is that he assumes she will find him the slippers. It is rather inconclusive as to whether they end up together or not, but in the 50s and 60s, chances were pretty good that this is what the viewing public would have wanted. (It’s a 3-hour show – trust me, there’s more to it, but not substantially.)

Something changed in 2018. Perhaps it was #MeToo. Perhaps Broadway was interested in faithfullness to Shaw’s own take on the ending, which has Eliza ambivalently leaving Henry to go to her father’s wedding. She does find her own worth and leaves Professor Higgins behind.

I found a clue in the scene where there is a small suffragette protest in the street. “Votes for Women” read the signs. In 1913, this would have been a current topic just before the beginning of WWI. The suffragette movement was gaining momentum in the US, UK, all over Europe, and worldwide.

The change in 2018, was neither ambivialent nor inconclusive. When Henry says, “Where the devil are my slippers?” Eliza’s response is to walk out on him. The unspoken change? She put in the work. She has learned her worth and value. She can do without Henry Higgins.

Happy birthday to my strong, sweet, and intelligent daughter. I like the new Eliza better. None of us are quite the same as we used to be.

Take it from the Top, with Jesus as Director

Last Sunday, I preached on the encounter between Jesus and the Jewish leader Nicodemus. Nicodemus comes to Jesus under cover of darkness to ask some questions. From these questions, we have Jesus answer, depending on your version of scripture, that one must be “born again, or born from above.” One of my doctoral advisors, Steve Thomason offered that both could be correct, but maybe in today’s common language, it might also be translated, “take it from the top.” I have lots of musician and theater people in my congregation and this version resonated with me. What if, as Christians, we took it from the top, and let Jesus direct in a new way? One of my landing places was that if Jesus was directing us, we would certainly not dehumanize each other. The most pressing example for members of our congregation on this day was a current comment that “transgender people ought to be eradicated.” To eradicate is what we wish to do to diseases, rodents, or bugs. It is not a word to be used regarding other humans made in the image of God. Here’s a link

Left vs Right, or Human Rights

Do you know about Human Rights? Human Rights are they are common principles or norms for all humans. These rights are not just for a few, but for all of humanity. They also cross political dividing lines. The best known collection of Human Rights is the UN Declaration of Human Rights from 1948. After the atrocities of WWII (and WWI) countries from around the globe gathered to discuss what humans ought to expect from and for each other as cohabitators of this planet. The full list of 30 from this document are in the link below.

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

FYI – Eleanor Roosevelt was a champion in this effort, and ensured that the language of this Human Rights Declaration was gender inclusive.

If you would like a workshop on Human Rights for your school or organization please contact me. I am trained through the US Institute of Diplomacy and Human Rights as a Certified Consultant on Human Rights.

Christian, But Not Fundamentalist

The ELCA (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America) a large Christian denomination in the United States.

Welcome to the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA). The ELCA is a church of about 4 million members who actively participate in God’s work in the world. We believe that we are freed in Christ to serve and love our neighbor.

With our hands, we do God’s work of restoring and reconciling communities in Jesus Christ’s name throughout the world. We are a church that belongs to Christ. There is a place for you here. We live in many different communities, span all ages, cultures and races and bring to this church unique life experiences and perspectives. Seek answers to your questions and discover what God is calling you to in life.

ELCA.org

Who are we? One of the things about being a large denomination is that we don’t all agree on everything. In fact, the congregation I serve tends to lean toward the progressive side of most issues. Not all ELCA congregation are like this. Some are more conservative. Recently, I had a brunch with a group of members of my congregation so we could talk about how we talk to other Christians who have “defined us” in their own minds and in their own talking points.

Some of the things we talked about start with the reality that Christians seemed to have been able to disagree about things more agreeably in years past. All over the country, communities could have a Thanksgiving service with Baptists, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Methodists, and so forth, quite easily. We all believed in Jesus. It didn’t matter so much whether we chose to have grape juice or wine for communion. It didn’t matter so much whether we baptized infants, or only older believers. We believed in Jesus, worshiped God together, and set aside some of our differences.

Today, Christians seem to be more polarized. The difference is that some of these things are not just about opinions or doctrines. The places where I believe the lines are crossed are when individuals or whole groups of people are, 1. Dehumanized, 2. experiencing existential oppression, or 3. experiencing existential erasure. These things are all above and beyond the scope of difference of opinion, or even scholarly doctrine. They cross the line of experiencing “other” within the scope of humanity.

To Dehumanize another is to speak or act in such a way that people, whom we all consider to be made in the image of God, are less than human. Throughout history, dehumanizing metaphors have played a key role in the propaganda of genocidal regimes. Dehumanization always starts with language

Dehumanizing always starts with language, often followed by images. We see this throughout history. During the Holocaust, Nazis described Jews as Untermenschensubhuman. They called Jews rats and depicted them as disease-carrying rodents in everything from military pamphlets to children’s books. Hutus involved in the Rwanda genocide called Tutsis cockroaches. Indigenous people are often referred to as savages. Serbs called Bosnians aliens. Slave owners throughout history considered slaves subhuman animals.

https://brenebrown.com/articles/2018/05/17/dehumanizing-always-starts-with-language/

We can all imagine more references. What comes to mind when you see/hear the word “illegals?”

When a country is at war with another country, the enemy is usually referred to by euphemisms that dehumanizes them. When immigrants are fleeing from a dangerous place, seeking refuge, they are often referred to in derogatory, and less than human terms to keep them out of a potential host country. Are they less than human, of course not. But some people have a stake in keeping them out. “Antifa” is a relatively new term. At it’s root, it means to encompass those who are against fascism, as if it were a bad thing and we didn’t fight at least one World War over this. But it is a derogatory word meant to be spewed at or about the “other.” Using dehumanizing words is intended to makes the user sound or seem less cruel in “othering the other.”

Using words or phrases that do not mean what they generally mean, is also a language usage intended to draw allies and detract opposition. The “pro-life” movement seems to have Christian roots, but when they start dehumanizing the very human mother carrying zygote or fetus a line is being crossed. There is a strong correlation between those who expess “pro-life” opions, and those who favor the death penalty.

Existential Oppression overlaps dehumanization. This term literally means that some people find it acceptable to oppress the very existence of other people. Slavery is perhaps the example we can look to with the most clarity. In its day, and for many years after, it was common practice to take people from their home countries, communities, professions, and families, put them on slave ships, and create slaves out of human beings. It was a cultural norm to buy and sell human beings (because of their skin color) and treat them with cruelty, poverty, and hardship. In the United States today, human trafficing is still a major issue. Were they doctors, lawyers, educators? Did they have family, community, loved ones? That form of their existence was unimportant to those who stood to gain by their oppression.

Existential Erasure is from a similar mindset. Most often, it happens on a systemic level. (i.e. mob mentality). When American Indians were dehumanized by calling them savages (dehumanize), it became no more than sport to kill these human beings, and take all that they had. This and colonialism all over the world was supported and encouraged by Church Doctrine from the 15th century. (The Doctrine of Discover.) Hitler’s drive to erase the Jews from history is well documented. There are other forms of existential erasure that are less understood, but becoming far to culturally commonplace. Consider recent movements to ban books and ban black history from being taught. There are many excuses being used, but the end goal is the same – “do not let anyone know that this happened or that they existed.”

Do yourself a favor and visit a holocaust museum. At the very least, visit a holocaust museum website. Dehumanizing, Existential Oppression, and Existential Erasure all start with words. But they can have horrific consequences when the ball starts rolling and no one is there to stop it. Luke 18 gives us an idea how Jesus handled it when a self-righteous person “othered” another.

The Parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector

He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and regarded others with contempt: 10 “Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. 11 The Pharisee, standing by himself, was praying thus, ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other people: thieves, rogues, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. 12 I fast twice a week; I give a tenth of all my income.’ 13 But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven but was beating his breast and saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’ 14 I tell you, this man went down to his home justified rather than the other, for all who exalt themselves will be humbled, but all who humble themselves will be exalted.”

Luke 18